What is the core Hindu teaching of Oneness?
Hinduism, as we know, is very diverse. It has a huge range of philosophical points of view, but oneness is a theme that runs through all these philosophical points of view in very interestingly different ways.
On the face of it, there’s so much diversity and difference in the world that we experience. Oneness is not obvious. To find oneness, we have to investigate. So when we investigate, we find oneness and that oneness is treated in Hinduism from different points of view, in different schools.
Advaita Vedanta has perhaps the ultimate level of oneness. But there’s also Vishishtadvaita, there is also Dvaita Vedanta, and many other schools.
In Advaita Vedanta, we regard the differences that we see in the world as appearances, as not ultimately true. You see, the experience of difference cannot be negated and need not be negated. The problems that difference creates, the problems of otherness, they are overcome by a spiritual insight into oneness.
How is this done in Advaita Vedanta? First of all, there is the difference between two different kinds of things or beings. This is called vijāti bheda. So a dog and a cat, a mouse and a dolphin, or maybe a planet and a proton, may be different. They are different kinds of things. Or it could be vastly different — a cup and say the number 10, these are widely different kinds of things.
There is another kind of difference, which is called sanjāti bheda, or differences within the same kind. So maybe two dogs or two cats. They are the same kind, but they are different.
And then there is swāgat bheda, that is difference within one entity or internal difference, like this body, for example. There’s a difference between the different parts of the body, hands and feet, head and tummy, and so on.
Now this is the conceptual framework with which I’ll discuss oneness in Indian thought. So we have three kinds of difference: 1) difference within one entity; 2) difference between two entities of the same kind, and; 3) difference between different kinds of entities.
Advaita Vedanta negates all of them. It says, ultimately, there is only one reality and there is no second reality apart from it. So there are no other kinds of realities. There’s only one reality, which is called Brahman or Pure Being, Pure Consciousness. That’s the only reality that is. And there’s nothing, no secondary reality apart from it. That’s why it’s called a non-dual. No second. There’s also not two kinds of the same Reality.
Are there two or three Brahmans, for example? No. There’s only one Brahman.
And within Brahman, are there differences? Are there parts of Brahman, for example? No. There are no parts of Brahman. It is one and indivisible.
So Brahman, to use the technical term, is swāgat vijāti bheda adhera, devoid of all kinds of differences. It is one homogeneous Reality without a second. This is the Advaitic perspective. And the best part of it is you are that Ultimate Reality. So the Upanishads tell us that Aham Brahmāsmi or I am Brahman, this very self is Brahman. The consciousness we feel within ourselves is the Ultimate Reality, all discoverable upon investigation, a spiritual investigation with the help of spiritual sadhana. So this is the ultimate perspective on oneness.
All of us are not only similar; we are not only brothers and sisters, we are literally one entity and not even parts — literally one Ultimate Reality, appearing as with so much difference.
So now one might ask, how do you come to this conclusion? In Advaita Vedanta, to put it very briefly, we come to this conclusion through 1) the sacred texts, that is the Upanishads; 2) through reasoning and; 3) through experience.
Chandogya Upanishad 621, for example, says, “My dear child, there is only one reality of Pure Being. One alone, without a second.” There are many, many, many such texts. Notice what it means is then. Ultimately speaking, in reality right now, right here, not in some future, not in some utopia or heaven, but right here, right now, it is always the truth that we are all not only just equal, we are, ultimately speaking, one reality. There’s absolute oneness in all living beings. You don’t have to be a Hindu for that. You don’t have to be a man or a woman. Whatever your gender, whatever your community or background, whatever your religion, whatever your species, you don’t even have to be a living thing for that. Any entity in the universe is in reality. That one absolute reality.
There is also a lot of logical argumentation about it. For example, one question would be, if clearly there is tremendous diversity, how do you see it’s all one? The reasoning goes like this — these are examples from the Upanishads. You might have a variety of ornaments and they’re golden ornaments. They are literally the same substance, gold. There are a variety of iron implements, a nail cutter, or maybe a hammer or something like that. But they’re all iron. So in that sense, the reality of all of them is one, they’re different only in name, form, and function. So if you say it works for gold, or it works for iron and implements, or it works for water and waves, but what is it in this reality? And if you knew that, you would be enlightened, of course. But I can let you into the secret. The reality here is Existence itself, or Consciousness itself. Pure Being, Pure Consciousness. And there are a lot of intricate arguments in Advaita Vedanta, which have been attacked by its opponents within Hinduism or from Buddhist perspectives. Over a thousand years of dialectics, there’s a lot of reasoning behind it.
And the final means to realize this truth is experience. So those who have practiced and investigated this truth, it finally becomes a living reality for them. That there is one reality at the heart, there is oneness at the heart of all this diversity.
There can be other grades of oneness also. So the Vishishtadvaitic perspective would be yes, there is no other reality, apart from that ultimate Brahman. So sanjāti bheda is rejected. There’s nothing apart from that Ultimate Reality, Brahman. Even vijāti bheda is rejected in that there’s nothing apart from that Ultimate Reality. There are no two ultimate realities or three ultimate realities, there’s only one.
But in Vishishtadvaita, in that one Ultimate Reality, there is difference. So there are sentient beings or jiva and there’s nonliving matter or ajiva, and there is the Ultimate Reality Brahman. So they say Asesha Chit-Achit Prakāram Brahmaikameva Tatvam, that Ultimate Reality is qualified by sentient and insentient beings. So we, for example, are sentient parts of Brahman, you notice parts have been introduced now. In Advaita, no parts. And the table and the chair are insentient parts of Brahman. And Brahman is the whole, It’s an organic unity.
If you go further to Dvaita Vedanta, dualistic Vedanta, again, there are multiple schools of Dvaita Vedanta. They all had their own take and they all insist on oneness, but in different senses. So for example, in Dvaita Vedanta there is an Ultimate Reality, Brahman, the same Ultimate Reality. The world and we are different from it, but we are all under the sway and the dominion of the One. We are all, literally let us say, one as a child, as the children of one Ultimate Reality, of one God. So these are the senses in which a oneness is found in Hinduism, in Hindu thought.
How should this teaching translate to how we treat all people, all living things, and the planet?
In Hinduism, whatever the school of Hinduism, notice it doesn’t say that this oneness exists for you only if you believe in this or you belong to a community, or you belong to a particular gender, or even if you’re only a Hindu. the benefits of this do not flow to you only if you are Hindu. It’s an impersonal truth. It’s true regardless of what community one belongs to, what nation, which time you belong to. So we find this divinity in everybody.
Swami Vivekananda put it beautifully. We Hindus worship a transcendent, immanent God. So the Ultimate Reality between worship, all Hindus, is just like the idea of God, beyond everything, transcendent, beyond time and space, beyond creation. But immanent also, in and through everything. So every being whom we worship in some sense, there’s divinity there.
In a Vishishtadvaitic sense, that being is a part, is under the dominion, or is the child of the divinity. There is a relationship between that divinity. So we see God in everything and our relationship to all living beings, to all human beings, living beings, is one of love, respect, seeing the imminent divinity there, and harmony.
So oneness in the ultimate sense, when it appears as difference, then what do you do with the difference? You can’t squash it together into oneness. So the difference is harmonized. It’s a message of harmony of religions, harmony of people, of the genders, all of that. So live in harmony and peace and respect and service. So Sri Ramakrishna’s beautiful dictum is, “By finding Shiva, the divinity in all beings, serve them. So serve all beings, knowing them to be Shiva.” That is our attitude towards all living beings.
What quotes from sacred texts best express this teaching of our divine connectedness?
It’s scattered across the whole gamut of Hindu scriptures. You go back to the oldest, the Rig Veda, of course, it is oft quoted and rightly so. Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti or “The truth is one, the wise speak of it differently.”
I remember reading Robert Wright, who lives in Princeton. He’s written several books. He’s a Darwinist, a Neo-Darwinist. He’s written this book, Evolution of God. It’s mostly about the Abrahamic religions, and then in the last chapter, he mentions Hinduism. And he says, what are the prospects for peace between the Abrahamic religions, between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, which have a long history of violence? He then says, there’s a formula discovered by the ancient Hindus. The truth is one, the wise speak of it differently. It’s only by that way of thinking that we can even think of having peace between the religions of the world.
The Maha Upanishads is there which is Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, that the whole world are our relatives. So notice if there is oneness at the heart of all existence, a uniform oneness, when that oneness is expressed as diversity, then what happens to the diverse human beings, animals, plants? We become relatives. We are part of one family because we are ultimately one Reality.
Then you come to something like the Isha Upanishad. Isha Upanishad verses six and seven literally speaks about the benefits of oneness. yas tu sarvāṇi bhūtani ātmany evānupaśyati sarvabhūteṣu catmānaṁ tato na vijugupsate, “Who sees all beings in one’s own self and one’s own self in all beings.”
Then Tatra ko mohaḥ kaḥ śokaḥ ekatvam anupaśyataḥ, “In this knowledge, in this realization, all beings are known to be one with yourself. For that person, where is delusion, where is sorrow, where is suffering?”
In the Bhagavad Gita, in the fourth chapter, verse number 24. You have a brahmārpaṇaṁ brahma havir brahmāgnau brahmaṇā hutam brahmaiva tena gantavyaṁ brahma-karma-samādhinā. In every aspect of our life, in our activities, the instruments with which we act, the person who acts, our own bodies, other people, those for whom we do the actions, the materials with which we act, this entire world in which we are dealing with, this world of diversity, it is all Brahman. Enlightenment, freedom, salvation, whatever you call it, only the one who sees this oneness, this radical oneness at the heart of diversity, achieves it.
Then there is Bhagavad Gita 13.3, really across the whole of the Gita, you’ll find many, many statements of oneness. Kṣhetra-jñaṁ chāpi māṁ viddhi sarva-kṣhetreṣhu bhārata. Krishna says, “Know me O Arjuna to be the Consciousness, the one Consciousness in all beings.” That means all beings are one Consciousness, one awareness. It goes far beyond solidarity. It’s not that we are all different, we are all united, not united; we are identical, one Reality.
Then one more quote from the very beautiful Shiva Mahimā Stotra. All these paths lead to the same reality. It’s the seventh verse of the Shiva Mahimā Stotra verse 7. It says: There are three Vedas, the Sankhya philosophy, the Yoga philosophy, the Pashupati philosophy, the Vaishnava philosophy. They are different paths. They all lead to thee. Just as the different rivers wind their way to the same ocean. So O Lord, all beings in paths straight or winding, they come to thee.
For the Hindu, it’s very easy to extend it the the Hindu encounter of Christianity or Islam, or some other points of view, all right, that’s one more path. We are used to this enormous diversity. We never thought if one is right, the rest have to be false. It is so deeply embedded in Western thought, because maybe of centuries of having only one religion. So it’s mostly Christianity and a little bit of Judaism maybe, or in some parts of the world, just about mostly Islam. So what happens is this seems to be the truth and whatever else is there must be false. That is something we never thought about. We thought that this is one path. And so these other others must be paths too. Yes, you can all be welcome to say that your path is better, it suits you better, but that does not mean that everybody else has to accept that my path is better.
When you go buy a toothpaste in the convenience store, you don’t say, you’re right to say that is the best toothpaste, but it will be crazy to say it has to be the best for everybody else.It’s best for you. And you select it only because you think it’s the best one. That’s why you bought it. And I’m not sure if that’s the most subtle kind of example.
To have one tradition of books and one system of belief, one system of practices, and then schisms within each one leading to violence and struggle, is wrong. And therefore, when people come across a system like Hinduism, it seems chaotic, diverse, not even like one religion. The problem is with them. It’s not with Hinduism.
What quotes from sacred texts best express this teaching of our divine connectedness?
The Princess of Kashi is a wonderful parable. Many years ago, in a kingdom far away, the royal family decided to host a play in the royal court. The play was called ‘The Princess of Kashi.’
The king and queen had only their young son. The queen suggested that the prince be dressed up to play the role of the Princess of Kashi. He was five or six at the time and the right age for the character.
During the dress rehearsals, the queen was so pleased at how cute the prince looked and so she ordered a portrait to painted to remember the royal play. The artist painted the date at the bottom alongside the words, ‘The Princess of Kashi.’
Eventually, the painting went where many artifacts in the royal palace landed — the cellar. Many years later, the prince, much older now and with no memory of the play, looking for something else in the cellar, stumbled upon the painting.
“What a beautiful young girl,” he thought to himself. He peered closer at the painting and saw the words, “The Princess of Kashi.”
“She’s a princess, and by the date inscribed here, close to my age,” he thought to himself. Day after day, he would come down to the cellar to stare at the beautiful princess, wondering what she might be doing? What she was like? How beautiful she may have grown? The prince had fallen in love with the Princess of Kashi.
The king and queen began noticing that their son had grown aloof. When they inquired, he grew too shy to tell them that he was lovesick.
The queen asked a trusted minister to see if he could get through to the prince to find out what was bothering him so.
The minister took the young prince out into the royal gardens and asked, “My dear Prince, what ails you?”
Feeling he could open up to the minister, who had often advised he in the past, the prince, shyly admitted, “Well, I’m in love.”
“This is wonderful, “ the minister said. “It is time you marry and take greater responsibility for the kingdom. Who is she? Where is she?
The prince responded, “The Princess of Kashi. I’ve not met her, but she’s my age.”
“Wait, you’ve not met her?” asked the minister while a flood of questions entered his mind, “Princess of Kashi? Why does that name sound so familiar and how does the prince know of her but not yet met her?”
“I saw a painting of her in the royal cellar. She’s my age based on the date on the painting. I want to marry her,” the prince proclaimed.
“Painting in the cellar?!?! Show me.”
And so the minister and the prince went back into the palace and down a winding stairwell to the cellar. The prince lifted the drop cloth from the painting.
The minister smiled. “Oh my dear prince. I must tell you something…”
“What is it?” asked the prince hesitatingly.
“You can’t marry her,” said the minister.
“Why?!?!” the prince exclaimed. “Is she already betrothed to another? Is she the daughter of an enemy of our kingdom?”
“O young highness. You can’t marry her because you are the Princess of Kashi!”
The minister then told him the story of the royal play held so many years ago and how it was the prince himself who was dressed up to play the role of the Princess of Kashi.
The prince stepped back in disbelief. On realizing that the person he had been yearning for was actually him, his desire for the princess immediately disappeared.
Vedanta tells us that, in seeing difference in the world, we seek happiness in the outside world. when really it is the reality within us. There is no other apart from you. There is only you.