Taking Sides: Why the Supreme Court's Prayer Decision Divides and Alienates - Hindu American Foundation
On The Issues

Taking Sides: Why the Supreme Court’s Prayer Decision Divides and Alienates

By May 9, 2014 September 21st, 2020 One Comment

The United States is a nation of Christians.  As such, any citizen should be willing to sit through a Christian invocation or prayer in order to engage in the civic process.  That is the ultimate conclusion from Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway.  While Justice Kennedy, a practicing Catholic, may view this as an acceptable outcome, as a non-Christian, I am significantly more concerned.  From my own experience as a religious minority, I have witnessed firsthand the alienating effect of publicly imposed sectarian messages.

Author of the Majority opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway

Justice Kennedy, Author of the Majority opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway. Photo courtesy of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Growing up Hindu in heavily Christian Texas, I did not lack reminders that I was different.  Between well-meaning classmates urging me to save my soul and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes’ monopoly over much of student life (the non-Christian athletes clearly did not need fellowship), I was consistently taught that being Hindu was something to be abandoned, not celebrated.  However, the behavior of my classmates never rankled as much as the public embrace of Christianity by the Texas state government.  Our Governor proclaimed that non-Christians were destined for Hell, while state legislators trumpeted their commitment to bringing prayer into schools. My own school, while public and home to a wide diversity of religious identities, invited Christian speakers to come  speak to students about the power of God’s love and how it could help conquer everything from drugs to premarital sex.

I doubt that any of the speakers involved intended to be insensitive or malicious.  Nevertheless, the cumulative effect of even benign impositions of faith was to make me, a non-Christian, feel like I didn’t belong.  With every school event that included a prayer “in Jesus’ name,” I internalized that the way I prayed was wrong.  Everytime I heard a state leader refer to the Constitution as being based in the Bible, I wondered if the principles of American government were alien to non-Christians.  Despite being an American citizen, I felt like an outsider.  It is this point that Justice Kagan, herself Jewish, made so eloquently in her dissenting opinion.

“[Sectarian prayers] express beliefs that are fundamental to some, foreign to others-and because that is so they carry the ever-present potential to both exclude and divide.”

Unfortunately, regardless of good intentions, government-sanctioned sectarian prayers will ultimately equal government-sanctioned Christian prayers.  We continue to live in a country where Christian principles are extolled and celebrated, while religious minorities often face derision and contempt.

Take the opening invocation before the U.S. Senate given by Rajan Zed, a Hindu cleric and interfaith leader in Nevada.  On July 12, 2007, Zed was barely a few words into his prayer when he was interrupted by protesters shouting Bible verses.  A Hindu prayer has never been offered before the Senate since.

Rajan Zed waits as protesters interrupt the invocation. Photo courtesy of C-Span 2.

Rajan Zed waits as protesters interrupt the invocation. Photo courtesy of C-Span 2.

Or take the decision by Arizona State Rep. Juan Mendez to offer a respectful non-religious speech in the place of an invocation.  This gesture drew derision from Rep. Steve Smith, a Christian, who declared the next day’s prayer to be one “in penitence” after Rep. Mendez’s actions.  The message to agnostics and atheists is once again clear: your views are not respected or encouraged.

Additional examples of hostility to religious minorities abound: whether it is the condemnation that Rep. Keith Ellison received for taking his oath of office on a Koran (originally belonging to Thomas Jefferson); or the Chief Justice of Alabama declaring that non-Christians cannot expect any protection under the First Amendment; or Senate candidates in Iowa declaring that all federal judges must be willing to follow Biblical law.  The Supervisor of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has already stated that non-Christian prayers will not be welcome at meetings.  In such an environment, it is unlikely that religious minorities will seek and receive any meaningful representation among the sectarian prayers being offered.

None of this is to say that Christians should not express their faith in public or that the government must maintain some kind of sanitized atheism.  However, public figures seeking to impose sectarian prayer would be wise to understand its divisive potential.  Just because local governments can incorporate sectarian prayer doesn’t mean they should.

After all, we may be a nation of Christians, but we are also a nation of Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, Agnostics, Atheists, and many other faith groups.  Do we really want a government where religious minorities must subject themselves to sectarian prayer in order to participate?  How many will choose not to participate in the process at all?  It is our government’s responsibility to treat all citizens equally, regardless of their religious affiliation.  No one should have to feel the alienation that I did.

For more information, please see the Hindu American’s Foundation’s statement.


One Comment

  • Namaste. Very good relevant & pragmatic article. Please keep up the good work. In India too, now, in the last 10 years the Christian evangelists had the field open to “soul harvest”. Please do read Rajiv Malhotra’s books and encourage other Indians in USA to read it too.

Leave a Reply

10/28/22Dr. Anandibai Joshi

Dr. Anandi Gopal Joshi is credited with being the first woman from India to study medicine in the United States. Born in Bombay in 1865, she was married at the age of ten to an older man who had been her teacher. Dr. Joshi had a child at the age of 13, but the child died when only 10 days old. She believed that with better medical care, the child would have lived, and she frequently cited this as motivation for her desire to attend medical school. Her husband encouraged her in her academic pursuits and in 1883, Joshee joined the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania, now known as the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia. She graduated in 1886 with her degree in medicine; her M.D. thesis focused on Hindu obstetrics. Unfortunately,  Dr. Joshi was only able to practice medicine for a few months before passing away from tuberculosis.

Science in Hinduism

10/2/2022Gandhi Jayanti

Gandhi Jayanti marks the birthday of Mahatma Gandhi, the ‘Father of the Nation’ for India and the Indian Diaspora. To honor Gandhi’s message of ahimsa (non-violence), volunteer events and commemorative ceremonies are conducted and statues of Gandhi are also decorated with flower garlands. Gandhi and the satyagraha (truth force) has inspired many of America’s most prominent civil rights and social impact movements and leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., and Cesar Chavez. The United Nations declared October 2 as the International Day of Non-Violence in honor of Gandhi, whose work continues to inspire civil rights movements across the world.

Examining the Impact of Mahatma Gandhi on Social Change Movements

Why we should not tear down statues of Gandhi

10/1/2022First Hindu temple in US

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 facilitated the journey of many Indian immigrants to the United States. In this new land, many created home shrines and community temples to practice and hold pujas (services). As Hindu American populations grew in metropolitan and rural areas, so did the need to find a permanent temple site for worship. In 1906, the Vedanta Society built the Old Temple in San Francisco, California but as this was not considered a formal temple, many don’t credit this with being the first. Others believe it is the Shiva Murugan Temple built in 1957 in Concord, California, whereas others believe it is the Maha Vallabha Ganapati Devanstanam in New York that should be considered the first. Today, there are nearly 1,000 temples in the United States . Regardless of where you live, you have the right to practice your faith.

A Guide To Temple Safety and Security

5 Things to Know About Visiting a Hindu Temple